|
Page 1A transcript reads:
this case has taken an awful length of time to try.
Judge said on recording
(0 min 8 sec):
this case has taken an inordinate
[excessive, unwarranted]
length of time to try.
Page 2C transcript reads:
The relevant issues start on 24th
December
sorry 24th
September, 1969
Judge said on recording
(5 min 44 sec):
The relevant issues start on 24th
September, 1969
Page 2E transcript reads:
in relation to the Nuneaton scrape back.
Judge said on recording
(7 min 1 sec):
in relation to the Nuneaton burglary.
Page 2F
missing from transcript.
Judge said on recording
(7 min 41 sec):
Perry said that, if applied to that tip-off, must indicate that youd see
the defendant right later on.
Page 2H transcript reads:
he met the defendant outside the Grove public house
Judge said on recording
(8 min 45 sec)
he met the defendant outside the Rose public house
Page 3G transcript reads:
there is a tape-recording which is Exhibit Twelve
sorry, Exhibit Two
Judge said on recording
(12 min 50 sec)
there is a tape-recording which is Exhibit Two 2.
Page 4D transcript reads:
there is another meet between Perry and the defendant at the Grove
public house.
Judge said on recording
(15 min 9 sec):
there is another meeting at the Grove public house.
Page 5D transcript reads:
there is no duty or burden of answer or account upon this or any other
defendant
Judge said on recording
(19 min 17 sec):
there is no duty or burden of any sort or kind upon this or any other
defendant
Page 6C transcript reads:
there are three separate times
three different payments
Judge said on recording
(22 min 15 sec):
there are three separate payments
Page 6G transcript reads:
if you accept them, accept the passages like that about the defendant
being in a firm
Judge said on recording
(23 min 57 sec):
if you accept them, accept some passages like that about the defendant
being in a firm in a firm
Page 6G transcript reads:
then the corruption is
(inaudible).
Judge said on recording
(24 min 8 sec):
then the corruption you may believe is perfectly obvious.
Page 7A transcript reads:
in the circumstances a favour which is obviously a dishonest one that is
got out in connection with improper conduct by the defendant as a police
officer.
Judge said on recording
(25 min 0 sec):
in the circumstances he got a favour which is obviously a dishonest one
that its got to be in connection with improper conduct by the defendant as
a police officer.
Page 7B transcript reads:
can it be said on any view that they were honest gifts.
Judge said on recording
(26 min 3 sec):
can it be said on any form that they were honest gifts.
Page 8A transcript reads:
Equally it is not relevant
Judge said on recording
(29 min 1 sec):
Equally it doesnt matter
Page 8B transcript reads:
it doesnt matter from the point of view of the indictment.
Judge said on recording
(29 min 31 sec):
it does matter from the point of view of the indictment.
Page 10A
missing words from transcript.
Judge said on recording
(35 min 51 sec):
if you accept those as being original and authentic, and thats going to
become much clearer later.
Page 11A transcript reads:
an acknowledgement by Perry of what
an acknowledgement of Symonds of
what Perry is saying.
Judge said on recording
(40 min 33 sec)
an acknowledgement by Symonds of what Perry is saying.
Page 11D transcript reads:
because Im in a firm
Judge said on recording
(41 min 47 sec):
because Im in a little firm in a firm
Page 11E transcript reads:
it gives a fairly horrifying glimpse of what was going on at the time.
Judge said on recording
(42 min 10 sec):
it gives a fairly horrifying glimpse of what was happening as far as the
defendant was concerned at the time.
Page 11F transcript reads:
most powerful support that the gifts
Judge said on recording
(42 min 21 sec)
most powerful support for the allegation that the gifts
Page 11G transcript reads:
there was evidence from Mr Eley or Mr King
Judge said on recording
(42 min 45 sec):
there was evidence from Mr Penna I think it was referring to Mr Eley
Page 12A transcript reads:
there is independent support for Perry.
Judge said on recording
(43 min 51 sec)
there is just support for Perry.
Page 12E transcript reads:
might I respectfully draw your attention to two statements which could be
capable of amounting to corroboration of the tapes.
Rivlin said on recording
(45 min 16 sec)
might I respectfully draw your attention to two matters that I submitted
could be capable of amounting to corroboration on the tapes.
Page 12F transcript reads:
I mentioned these matters. If your honour disagrees with me Your Honour
could say now.
Rivlin said on recording
(45 min 28 sec):
I mentioned these matters so that if your honour disagrees with me then the
jury can know about it now.
Page 12G transcript reads:
you see a reference there to Perry saying
Well again exactly the same
applies if you accept acknowledgement of Symonds of Perry saying hes only
got fifty
Judge said on recording
(46 min 5 sec):
you see a reference there to Perry saying: I aint got er, actually Ive
only got fifty alright. Pardon, from Symonds. Perry saying: Ive only
got fifty, again, alright. Symonds says: yeah. Well again, check its
underlined. If you accept that as an acknowledgement by Symonds of the fact
that Perry was saying hed only got fifty
|
